Cardiac Ablation: Neanderthal Medicine?

What is the difference between the Incas’ practice of drilling holes in people’s heads to alleviate pain and “Modern” medicine’s practice of cardiac ablation to alleviate tachycardia?

The difference is modern medicine has insurance codes to get paid for their treatments while the Inca’s surgeons received payment in the form of goods, services, and social privilege. In reality, modern medicine’s approach to healing is based on a Neanderthal concept. In contrast, the Inca surgeon’s procedure of trepanation had a utilitarian purpose. Trepanation was performed to treat traumatic head injuries, especially skull fractures caused by warfare or accidents. Unfortunately, most of modern medicine’s procedures are based on symptomatic relief.

A perfect example is the procedure, cardiac ablation. When the heart dysfunctions causing tachycardia or a rapid heart beat, modern medicine employs a destructive procedure called ablation. Doctors deliberately destroy what they call “abnormal” tissue in the body to treat a condition. The goal is usually to eliminate problematic tissue while preserving as much healthy tissue as possible. From a common sense perspective, it would make more sense to diagnose and eliminate the underlying cause for the rapid heart beat rather than destroy the overactive fibers. A case in point. I had a 4 year-old boy who was referred because of tachycardia. The doctors recommended ablation to remedy the problem. When I examined the patient, he had mercury in his heart, which was coming from a large mercury filling in one of his teeth. I recommended removal of the toxic material and food based chelating supplements. In six weeks, the child’s tachycardia totally disappeared. Insanity was defined by Albert Einstein as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

I recently did a consultation on an adult male who had the ablation procedure performed once before. It didn’t work. The patient presented with the same symptoms and the medical doctor recommended another ablation procedure. My diagnosis revealed toxic chemicals, COVID vaccine, graphene oxide, thioether, and strep infection in his heart. From an energetic perspective these factors were the “splinters” or initiators that were causing the problem. If you were the patient, would you choose another failed treatment or choose a noninvasive approach to remove the causative factors?